The RADAR: What drives change for China’s tech giants?

Share Article

This is the RADAR, Ranking Digital Rights’ newsletter. This special edition was sent on March 17, 2021. Subscribe here to get The RADAR by email.

In this final special edition of the RADAR, we’re highlighting RDR Founding Director Rebecca MacKinnon’s essay on three of China’s leading tech companies—AlibabaBaidu, and Tencent.

The above graph compares the amount by which digital platforms improved between 2019 and 2020, on indicators that remained unchanged between the two index cycles. Learn more.

In 2020, Baidu, which operates China’s leading search engine, improved significantly on indicators that held steady between our 2019 and 2020 indexes, as seen above.

In a surprising move in late 2020, Baidu published a human rights policy. The policy is limited in scope (the company pledges to protect human rights “within the bounds of national law”), but this was still an unusual step for a Chinese tech company.

What caused Baidu to do this? More broadly, what are the forces that push Chinese companies to change?

Spotlight on China’s tech giants

In her essay for the 2020 RDR Index, Rebecca offers an expert analysis of the market and political forces driving decision-making at Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent. In the introduction, she writes:

China’s system of authoritarian internet control has inescapable consequences for Chinese companies in the RDR Index: Baidu and Tencent have always ranked at or near the bottom. In 2020, we evaluated e-commerce giant Alibaba for the first time, and it landed low in the overall ranking, right next to Baidu.
Yet at the same time, Chinese companies have taken meaningful steps over the past five years to protect consumer privacy and security from threats that are unrelated to Chinese government surveillance. They have also tried to be a bit more open with users about how content is moderated for reasons other than government censorship requirements. As a result, between 2018 and 2019 Tencent and Baidu were among the most improved companies in the RDR Index, albeit still hovering at or near the bottom of the ranking.
Their progress shows that Chinese companies can and do respond to pressure from foreign governments, investors, and even users. But the extent to which they can improve policies and practices affecting users’ human rights is severely handicapped by China’s legal and political system. The hard reality is that Chinese companies are powerless to protect users (whether they are in China or abroad) from digital rights violations by one of the most powerful—and unaccountable—governments in the world.

Read the essay → 

 

RDR media hits

MIT Technology Review: In a long read on how Facebook’s “relentless pursuit of growth” has increased polarization and the spread of misinformation, Karen Hao quoted RDR Editorial Director Ellery Biddle commenting on the company’s “Responsible AI” initiative:

“It seems like the ‘responsible AI’ framing is completely subjective to what a company decides it wants to care about. It’s like [saying], ‘We’ll make up the terms and then we’ll follow them.’ I don’t even understand what they mean when they talk about fairness. Do they think it’s fair to recommend that people join extremist groups, like the ones that stormed the Capitol? If everyone gets the recommendation, does that mean it was fair?” Read via Tech Review

Digital Privacy News: “Facebook is extremely opaque about how it develops and deploys algorithms,” RDR Research Director Amy Brouillette told Digital Privacy News, for a story on AI and privacy risks. “Facebook does not publicly commit to protect users’ expression and privacy rights as it trains and deploys algorithms…Nor does it conduct risk assessments about the impact of these systems on freedom of expression and privacy.” Read via Digital Privacy News

Protocol: Last week’s edition of the Protocol | China newsletter pointed to our research on the leading Chinese companies, noting that they published no information about how they handle government requests for user data. Read via Protocol

Bloomberg: A story on network shutdowns in Africa cited research by RDR Company Engagement Lead Jan Rydzak, which showed that curbing access to social media “tended to fuel rather than reduce violence.” The story continued: “internet shutdowns in Algeria and Sudan did nothing to quell protests—and may in fact have stoked outrage and accelerated their leaders’ downfalls.” Read via Bloomberg

Where to find us

CIPE Philippines | Putting Digital Rights on the Corporate Governance Agenda
March 23 at 9:00 PM EST | Register here
Rebecca will join the Center for International Private Enterprise, a core institute of the National Endowment for Democracy, to discuss technology’s role in democratic society in Southeast Asia.

The Policy Circle | Big Tech Tightrope: Balancing Free Speech, Privacy & Innovation
March 24 at 1:00 PM EST | Register here
Rebecca will join Steve DelBianco, president of NetChoice, and Jillian York, director of International Freedom of Expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation to discuss the fundamentals of free speech on social media and public policy reforms for big tech companies.

 

Subscribe here to get The RADAR by email.

Highlights

A decade of tech accountability in action

Over the last decade, Ranking Digital Rights has laid the bedrock for corporate accountability in the tech sector by demanding transparency from both Big Tech and Telco Giants.

RDR Series:
Red Card on Digital Rights

A story of control, censorship, and state surveillance during the FIFA World Cup in Qatar

Related Posts

Sign up for the RADAR

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay in touch!