Telecommunications companies

Telenor ASA

Rank: 6th
Score: 38%out of 100

Headquartered in Norway, Telenor Group offers mobile and fixed-line broadband services to 160 million customers across the Nordic countries and Asia as of 2026.

Despite some improvements in its overall transparency, Telenor only ranked 6th this year, as MTN and América Móvil rose above it in the ranking. The company continued to show strength in governance practices, but persistent weaknesses remained in its transparency on privacy and operational accountability.

In 2022, after the military coup in Myanmar, Telenor sold its subsidiary in the country to Lebanon’s M1 Group, which in turn handed off its operations to a conglomerate linked to the Burmese military. Years later, the company continued to face scrutiny for the practices of its former Burmese subsidiary and the human rights impacts of its decisions.

Telenor launched an Expert Forum in 2023 “to explore possible future dilemmas Telenor may face in respecting human rights.” The following year, the Norwegian National Contact Point for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct found that Telenor had breached international standards on human rights due diligence in Myanmar. The report reinforced concerns about how the company manages severe risks when operating under authoritarian regimes. These problems intensified in 2025, when investigations and lawsuits alleged that Telenor had shared data with Myanmar’s military authorities that enabled arrests and abuse.

Meanwhile, strategic retreats, mergers, and consolidations accelerated in the company’s other operating markets. Telenor’s Malaysian subsidiary Digi merged with Celcom in 2022 and became the country’s largest operator. By early 2026, the company had also sold its entity in Pakistan and mostly divested from its counterpart in Thailand, leaving Grameenphone in Bangladesh as the sole remaining telco in Asia in which Telenor holds a majority stake. We found slight improvements in Telenor’s reporting on government user data requests, but the broader impact of its divestments on transparency remains unknown.

In this year’s assessment, Telenor improved its human-rights-centered AI commitments through its new Principles for Responsible AI. The company’s results also reflected increased regulatory scrutiny of how it governs privacy. In March 2025, Norway’s Data Protection Authority fined Telenor over shortcomings in the organization and independence of its Data Protection Officer role, highlighting gaps in internal controls.

Overall, Telenor’s disclosures demonstrated leadership in certain telecom-specific areas, such as network shutdowns. However, the Myanmar case remained a defining test of whether transparency and governance structures could translate into credible protections when human rights risks escalate dramatically and the foundations of accountability break down.

Key takeaways

  • Telenor had relatively strong disclosures on its internal governance, but its transparency weakened at the operational level. While the company performed consistently well on oversight and internal training on human rights, it provided comparatively limited insight into how policies are enforced in practice. For example, Telenor did not publish any guidelines clarifying what advertising content is not allowed on its platforms. Nor did it release any data about the volume of content or ads it restricted to enforce its own policies.
  • Telenor’s transparency around its algorithmic systems remained its weakest point, despite some progress. Telenor strengthened its framework for responsible AI by enshrining human rights in its new set of AI principles. However, public disclosures on the company’s human rights impact assessments did not cover the risks of algorithmic systems or AI. While Telenor provided limited information on its use of algorithmic systems for network security, it failed to roll out any public-accessible document guiding the development of algorithmic systems.
  • Telenor was relatively transparent on how it handles government demands, particularly in relation to network shutdowns. It disclosed more information than many peers on network shutdown orders and related procedures, and offered relatively comprehensive details on government demands for user data. However, it still disclosed nothing on private requests, such as when another company sends a request for “non-public information” about one of its users.

Key recommendations

  • Strengthen and disclose human rights due diligence. Telenor should strengthen and publicly disclose regular, up-to-date human rights due diligence and risk assessment processes across the markets where it operates. It should update its jurisdiction-level legal risk assessments and clearly describe follow-up processes when risks are identified.
  • Disclose information about operational policy enforcement, covering the role of algorithms and automation. Telenor should publish clearer information about how it enforces key user-facing rules and practices, including how it identifies and acts upon violations, particularly where algorithmic systems are involved.
  • Improve transparency about handling of user data. Telenor should state clearly what user information it shares and with whom, naming third parties where feasible, and provide more comprehensive disclosures beyond limited categories such as directory data.

Services evaluated:

  • Telenor Norway (Prepaid mobile)
  • Telenor Norway (Postpaid mobile)
  • Telenor Norway (Fixed-line broadband)
  • Operating company evaluated: Telenor NorwayFor telecommunications companies, the RDR Index evaluates relevant policies of the parent company, the operating company, and selected services of that operating company.
  • Market cap: USD 23.58B (as of May 18, 2026)
  • OSE, based in Oslo: TEL
  • Read more about how stock structures can be a barrier to shareholder participation
  • Website: https://www.telenor.com

The 2026 RDR Index: Telco Giants Edition covers policies that were active on August 31, 2025. Policies that came into effect after August 31, 2025 were not evaluated for this ranking.

Scores reflect the average score across the services we evaluated, with each service weighted equally.

  • Lead researchers: Veszna Wessenauer, Jie Zhang

Changes since 2022

  • Telenor published new Responsible AI principles that more clearly ground the company’s approach to AI systems in human rights and relevant international standards.
  • The company previously disclosed how it assesses jurisdiction-level legal risks related to freedom of expression and privacy; however, these reports haven’t been updated since 2017, rendering them outdated.
  • For the first time, Telenor published information about how it governs AI implementations in security, emphasizing human oversight, model explainability, accountability, risk assessment, and continuous monitoring.
  • Telenor enhanced its security disclosures, reporting that it underwent external security audits, including ISO certification; and committed to notify authorities of “critical data security incidents.”

Scores since 2017

100%0%20172018201920202022202645%37%35%38%
Most companies’ scores dropped between 2019 and 2020 with the inclusion of our new indicators on targeted advertising and algorithmic systems. To learn more, please visit our Methodology development archive.
Governance66%
Freedom of expression31%
Privacy33%

We rank companies on their governance, and on their policies and practices affecting freedom of expression and privacy.

Governance 66%

Telenor performed relatively strongly on governance, ranking third in this category behind Telefónica and MTN. It continued to disclose details about its internal oversight structures and employee implementation mechanisms (G2, G3). The company also strengthened its commitments related to algorithmic systems governance through an overarching human-rights-centered Responsible AI policy (G1). However, its jurisdiction-level legal and regulatory human rights risks disclosures relied on outdated public reporting that has not been updated in recent years (G4a).

Freedom of expression 31%

Telenor placed third in this category, again behind Telefónica and MTN. The company continued to outperform many peers in telecom-specific areas of transparency, particularly around shutdown-related practices and handling of government demands, which remained salient given Telenor’s operations in higher-risk jurisdictions (F10). However, it remained less transparent about algorithmic system use and enforcement. Although it published a report on how it uses AI for network security and briefly explained its internal principles overseeing this use of AI, it provided no information about the adoption of AI in other areas (F1d).

Privacy 33%

Telenor’s privacy protections showed modest improvement, including somewhat stronger but still limited disclosure about when the company shares certain user information (P4). Despite this progress, Telenor ranked in the bottom half among the telecom operators we evaluated on privacy. This is especially notable given the Norwegian Data Protection Authority’s 2025 sanctions related to the organization and independence of Telenor’s Data Protection Officer function. The results point to persistent gaps in Telenor’s transparency on privacy issues, even amid increased regulatory and reputational scrutiny.

Indicators