Most companies have disclosed more about key policies and practices affecting users’ privacy and freedom of expression than in the past. Yet they still fell short on disclosing basic information to users about the design, management, and governance of the digital platforms and services that affect human rights. Read Chapter 2 to find out more about RDR Index leaders, and key highlights and trends.
Companies that led the RDR Index have stronger governance and oversight over human rights. Yet oversight and management of human rights risks faced by users remains inconsistent and uneven. Few companies provide effective grievance and remedy mechanisms. Read more about our Governance findings in Chapter 3.
A small number of internet platforms, mobile ecosystems, and telecommunications services have become powerful gatekeepers for public discourse and access to information. But most lack transparency about how online expression is policed. Read more in Chapter 4.
Nearly all ranked companies made some improvements to their disclosures of policies and practices affecting privacy in the past year. But companies that led the Privacy category of the 2019 RDR Index distinguished themselves by going beyond minimum legal requirements—at least in certain areas, even if they were deficient in others. Read more about our privacy findings in Chapter 5.
The RDR Index provides a clear standard for investors to use in evaluating company respect for users’ digital rights. Shareholder value is put at risk not only by security breaches, but also when companies fail to identify and mitigate broader human rights risks across their business operations. Read Chapter 6 to find out questions investors should ask of companies.